Preliminary findings are interesting. Doesn't seem to be familiar with decision-making literature. This is her third year in the program. She will have defended her proposal before the consortium. Timing is good for her. I would go with a 4 or 5 on Pam's scale.
Comments
Her research seems
Her research seems interesting and quite well thought out. Strong letter from advisor. On a 1-5 scale where 1=reject, 5=admit, I'd give her/him a 4.
Preliminary findings are
Preliminary findings are interesting. Doesn't seem to be familiar with decision-making literature. This is her third year in the program. She will have defended her proposal before the consortium. Timing is good for her. I would go with a 4 or 5 on Pam's scale.
Wants to understand how BI
Wants to understand how BI can and is used to support IS decision making. Exploratory case study.
I've bumped up my score since
I've bumped up my score since I'm pretty positive about her and I'm not sure that the translation from 4/5 reflected that on the 7-point scale.